Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

United Motion Theatre Company, a Copartnership, Richard Sloan, and Eugene Sloan v. Thomas H. Ealand, Doing Business as Ferndale Theatre, 11243 (1952)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit Number: 11243 Visitors: 2
Filed: Oct. 20, 1952
Latest Update: Feb. 22, 2020
Summary: 199 F.2d 371 UNITED MOTION THEATRE COMPANY, a copartnership, Richard Sloan, and Eugene Sloan, Appellants, v. Thomas H. EALAND, Doing Business as Ferndale Theatre, Appellee. No. 11243. United States Court of Appeals Sixth Circuit. Oct. 20, 1952. Alfred A. May and John Sklar, Detroit, Mich., for appellants. Bevan & Walter and Geroge Heideman, Detroit, Mich., for appellee. Before MARTIN, McALLISTER and MILLER, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM. 1 On the hearing of this appeal counsel for appellee was not
More

199 F.2d 371

UNITED MOTION THEATRE COMPANY, a copartnership, Richard
Sloan, and Eugene Sloan, Appellants,
v.
Thomas H. EALAND, Doing Business as Ferndale Theatre, Appellee.

No. 11243.

United States Court of Appeals Sixth Circuit.

Oct. 20, 1952.

Alfred A. May and John Sklar, Detroit, Mich., for appellants.

Bevan & Walter and Geroge Heideman, Detroit, Mich., for appellee.

Before MARTIN, McALLISTER and MILLER, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

1

On the hearing of this appeal counsel for appellee was not present and no brief having been filed on behalf of appellee, the appeal was heard upon the record and the brief and oral argument of attorney for the appellants;

2

And the Court being advised, it is now ordered that the order of June 22, 1950 herein appealed from be modified by the elimination therefrom of the following words in the second literary paragraph thereof:

3

'copies of all tax returns (including state employment and Federal Income, excess profits, with-holding, social security, payroll, excise and amusement or admission tax), and all related documents, memoranda and supporting data and all other documents, correspondence, papers, and memoranda kept recorded' and the words 'all material' in the sentence starting with the words 'Including, without limiting the generality of the foregoing.'

4

And as so modified, the order be and is affirmed. Hickman v. Taylor, 329 U.S. 495, 507, 67 S. Ct. 385, 91 L. Ed. 451; Annotation 8 A.L.R. 2d 1134; Garrett v. Fau, D.C., 8 F.R.D. 556; Welty v. Clute, D.C., 2 F.R.D. 429; O'Connell v. Olsen & Ugelstadt, D.C., 10 F.R.D. 142.

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer